Legal Opinion

Staples v. Hoefke

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1987No. B008757PublishedCited by 47 opinions

[Certified for partial publication.†]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J. *

—Plaintiffs appeal from judgments entered in favor of defendants on causes of action alleging breach of lease and trespass. Plaintiffs also appeal from the order denying plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, as well as the orders granting costs to defendants and sanctions against plaintiffs for filing a frivolous cost bill.

Facts

Plaintiff Dale Staples, majority stockholder in plaintiff Optronics Specialty Corporation, signed a lease to rent the premises at 8579 Canoga Avenue in December 1975. The lessor was defendant Otto Hoefke, who owned the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Pankow v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  5. Choate v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API