Legal Opinion

Roseborough v. Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1941No. Civ. 2737PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default and vacating a default judgment which had been entered in favor of the appellant and against the respondent.

The action was one for personal injuries in which the drivers and owners of several automobiles were named as defendants. The respondent was not named as a defendant but was served as one of the Jane Does, although the complaint was never amended to set forth her true name.

On November 29, 1939, the respondent’s default was entered by the clerk and on December 9, 1939, default judgment was entered against her. Notice of a motion to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McDonald v. SeveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bell v. KraussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Yoder v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. de McKinlay v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bergloff v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Batchelor v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Crenshaw v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Flores v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Jonson v. WeinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API