Legal Opinion
Jonson v. Weinstein
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1967No. Civ. 11360PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
After entry of a default and default judgment against him, defendant Eugene C. Weinstein—who had been served as a fictitiously named defendant—moved to set aside both the default and the judgment. Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting his motion.
The original complaint, filed August 2, 1963, was in seven counts. It designated as defendants 26 named individuals, 8 named corporations (including several banks and title companies) and 40 Does. The first count claimed damages of $300,000 for a fraudulent real estate exchange, alleging that plaintiffs had entered into the transaction in reliance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Rutan v. Summit Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gordon v. Strawther Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Thorson v. Western Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gainey v. Occidental Land ResearchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.