Bell v. Krauss
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing to set aside an order for the adoption of a minor child. Fred H. Taft, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. C. W; Hatton, W. S. Knott, and J. L. Fleming, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
On September 4, 1913, Hugh I. Krauss and Birdie M. Krauss, his wife, petitioned for permission to adopt Aileen Bell, a minor child then six years of age. On the same day the court made an order of adoption which was signed and filed September 4, 1913, but docketed and entered on the eighth day of September, 1913. On March 2, 1914, Jesse M. Bell, father of the minor child served and filed notice of a motion to be relieved from the consequences of said order, specifying in said notice Monday, the ninth day of March, 1914, as the day upon which he would make the- motion. In his said notice of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Campbell v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Guardianship of Van LoanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Schammel v. SchammelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Thomas v. Superior Court, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by35 opinions
- Chandler v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Lacher v. VenusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Yoder v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re Marriage of O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Estate of HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.