McDonald v. Severy
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was brought by plaintiff as the assignee of ten claimants to recover wages alleged to be due from defendants. Defendant Electrotone Corporation was not served and did not appear. On May 9, 1934, an agreement was made between defendant Severy and C. S. Murphy and his associates (plaintiff’s assignors), by the terms of which Severy agreed to confess judgment in the sum sued for, to pay $500 on or before May 20, 1934, and to assign certain property as security for his performance. In consideration of Severy’s promise, the claimants agreed to dismiss the action against…
2Cited by40 opinions
- Harth v. Ten EyckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sandoval v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Martino v. DeneviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.