Yates v. Russell

This is an action in replevin for an Interstate touring ear, brought by J. P. Yates, as plaintiff, against iWilliam P. Russell, as defendant.

As defenses to the action, defendant set forth in his answer: (1) That plaintiff was not the real party in interest, hut only the agent of the real party in interest, to wit, the Orient Insurance Company. (2) “Denies expressly and specifically that he is in the possession of said automoble unlawfully.” *340(3) Denies that demand for possession was made before suit was brought. By his cross-complaint he asserts he is the owner and entitled to the possession…