Kelsoe v. Grouskay
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
This is an action in replevin instituted by appellees hereinafter called plaintiffs, against appellants, hereinafter called defendants, for the possession of a 1942 Studebaker automobile. Defendants denied generally the allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint and filed a cross-complaint for recovery of possession of the car or for its value and for damages for loss of its use and for its depreciation.
The facts are that plaintiffs were the owners of the automobile in question and in April, 1947, sold it to one Phillip A. Karlyle for the sum of $1,495. Karlyle gave plaintiffs one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. GhernaArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Yates v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Patterson Motors, Inc. v. CortezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Simpson v. ShawArizona Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.