Legal Opinion

Sroufe v. Soto Bros.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1896No. Civil No. 469PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. Joseph D. Bethune, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRouse, J.

This is an action on an account. Plaintiffs had sold and delivered merchandise to defendants, and on that account claimed a balance of $1,399.05. They also claim $1,058.80, balance due on an account due one Charles Noble, and $1,240.78, balance due on an account due J. Leberman & Co. The last two claims mentioned had been assigned to plaintiffs. Defendants, in their answer, deny plaintiffs’ right to maintain an action on the two assigned accounts, for the reason that said accounts had been transferred to plaintiffs for collection ; that as to said accounts- plaintiffs are not the real parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Allen v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Meeker v. . ClaghornNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Young v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  5. Eaton v. . AlgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Freebourn v. Merchants' Credit Service, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Little v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. United Verde Extension Mining Co. v. RalstonArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Archer v. MusickNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API