Legal Opinion

Consolidated National Bank v. Cunningham

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1922No. Civil No. 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

In this action the Consolidated National Bank of Tucson seeks to recover from C. J. Cunningham the possession of a 1914 model Cadillac automobile or its value. It obtained possession of the car by filing the required affidavit and bond, but the jury by its verdict said that the defendant, Cunningham, was its owner and entitled to its possession, and that its value at the time of the commencement of the action was $1,000, and in pursuance of the right conferred by paragraph 1614, Civil Code of 1913, he elected to take its value instead of the car itself, whereupon judgment was entered in his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Brewster v. . SillimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Pope v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  4. Gray v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Lambert v. McFarlandNevada Supreme Court · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gallaway v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Pacific Finance Corp. v. GhernaArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Coffey v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. United Producers & Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. O'MalleyArizona Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API