Ayers v. Green Gold Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff to charge the property of the corporation defendant with a lien for certain work done by appellant in cleaning out a tunnel on the mining property of respondent. The action was brought against M. E. Crittenden, E. C. Lyles, and respondent, it being alleged that the labor was performed at the special instance and request of defendants Lyles and Crittenden, and that the latter was at the time in charge of said mine, and acting as the agent of the defendant mining company.
The court found that the work was performed for and at the special instance and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Reese v. Bald Mountain Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Montevista Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Leoni v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Street v. HazzardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Yates v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1919