Legal Opinion
Troha v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 25, 2010No. C.A. 05-191 EriePublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Plaintiffs, a certified class pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 23(b)(3), consist of individuals who own land that abuts or is traversed by a recreational trail in Elk and Cameron Counties, Pennsylvania. In this action, brought pursuant to the “Little Tucker Act,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), they contend that by virtue of the operation of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1241 et seq., they have been deprived of reversionary property interests in various portions of the recreational trail without just compensation in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raulerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Biery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ingram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Longnecker Property v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012