Legal Opinion

Biery v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 9, 2011No. Nos. 07-693L, 07-675LPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are fourteen Kansas landowners who claim to own the fee interests in land underlying two previously-operating sections of a railroad line.1 The plaintiffs claim that the defendant (“government”) effected a taking of the plaintiffs’ fee interest in the railroad corridor when the government approved the conversion of the subject railroad line to a recreational trail pursuant to the “railbanking” provision of the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983, 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d) (“Trails Act”). The plaintiffs, whose fee interest…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Raulerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Jenkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API