Legal Opinion

Longnecker Property v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 30, 2012No. 09-173LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*395OPINION

HORN, J.

At issue is a 3.46 mile right of way in Thurston County, Washington. The plaintiffs in this Longnecker class action allege that when the United States Department of Transportation, Surface Transportation Board (STB) issued a Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU), pursuant to the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1241-1251 (2006), and authorized conversion of the railroad line for use as a public recreational trail, the federal government denied plaintiffs their re-versionary interest in the rights of way located on their properties, formerly occupied by a railroad.…

2Cases cited190 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Caquelin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Anna F. Nordhus Family Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API