Legal Opinion
Ingram v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 24, 2012No. 10-463LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiffs, who claim property interests along a rail line in Beaufort County, South Carolina, filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that the government caused uncompensated takings of their property interests pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The rail line at issue in the above captioned ease is the former Port Royal Railroad line, extending twenty-five miles between milepost AMJ-443.26 in Yemassee, South Carolina, to milepost AMJ-468.31 in Port Royal, South Carolina. The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited154 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Caquelin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.