Palmer v. Fix
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover from the defendants the sum, of $3,571.88, together with interest and costs of suit. The complaint sets forth three causes of action. The first one alleges the common count for money; the second one is upon an account stated; the third one for money had and received to the use of the plaintiffs. The defendants answered, denied the indebtedness, and by way of a cross-complaint, stated a cause of action against the defendants for an accounting based upon a contract of agency between the parties, whereby the cross-complainants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Dam v. ZinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Alkus v. Johnson-Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Landreth v. South Coast Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.