Legal Opinion
DIAL 800 v. Fesbinder
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 2004No. B167032PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Dial 800, LLC, a California limited liability company and Dial 800, Inc., a California corporation, appeal from an order dismissing their interpleader action filed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 386 against defendants, David Fesbinder, Brenda Fesbinder (the Fesbinders), Michael Rosenblum, and Perpetual International Trading Limited (Perpetual), a Seychelles corporation. Perpetual is wholly owned by Mr. Rosenblum. Defendants are involved in a dispute over ownership interests of shares in plaintiffs. Defendants made conflicting…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Meshel v. Ohev Sholom Talmud TorahDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Serrano v. STEFAN MERLI PLASTERING CO.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- SWAB FINANCIAL v. E Trade SecuritiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.