Levins v. Rovegno
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Action of ejectment to recover possession of the undivided one half of a portion of fifty-vara lot IsTo. 469, in the city and county of San Francisco.
The cause was tried by the court, written findings filed, and judgment entered for defendants, from which judgment, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
George W. Manchester and Mary Ann Manchester were husband and wife. On the first day of August, 1857, the land in question was conveyed to Mary Ann Manchester, by deed of grant, bargain, and sale, and thereupon -Manchester and wife entered into…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gee v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Revalk v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Moss v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Taylor v. HargousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
- Herrold v. ReenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.