Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant in an action for unlawful detainer.
The court found that: On November 1, 1948, plaintiff leased certain premises to defendant under the terms of a written lease; it is untrue that the lease expired on December 31, 1950, and it is untrue that defendant has unlawfully detained the property; on December 29, 1950, defendant “was entitled to exercise the option hereinafter mentioned and that on or about said date defendant gave to plaintiff a written notice of the exercise of defendant’s option to renew and extend the said lease agreement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dam v. ZinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re Estate of BixlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hollenbach v. SchnabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rouse v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.