Legal Opinion

Miller & Lux Inc. v. Secara

California Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1924No. S. F. No. 9944PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

This is an action to quiet plaintiff’s title against the lien of an irrigation district assessment upon the ground of the invalidity of the organization of the defendant Madera Irrigation District, and the invalidity of an assessment of $35,859.96 levied by the board of directors of such irrigation district. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants.

The defendants claim that the defendant district was properly organized and that the plaintiff by suing the Madera Irrigation district as such, and alleging that it is claiming to be and acting as an irrigation district, has admitted at…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API