In Re Viagra Products Liability Litigation
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Pfizer, Inc.’s Motions (1) to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Specific Causation Experts, (2) to Exclude the Testimony of Cheryl Blume, Ph.D., and (3) for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, Pfizer’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Specific Causation Experts is granted; Pfizer’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Blume is granted in part and denied in part; and Pfizer’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. BACKGROUND
At the outset, the Court notes that in an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. Jo Anna BameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Paul Decker v. GE Healthcare Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.