Legal Opinion
Paul Decker v. GE Healthcare Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 20, 2014No. 13-4002PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
In 2005, in connection with a magnetic resonance imaging procedure (“MRI”), Paul Decker received a dose of Omniscan, a gadolinium-based contrast agent manufactured by GE Healthcare Inc. and GE Healthcare AS (“GEHC”). After taking Omniscan, Mr. Decker developed Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (“NSF”). In 2012, Karen and Paul Decker sued GEHC in the Northern District of Ohio, lodging a host of Ohio products liability claims and other tort claims. The Deckers’ case forms a part of a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”), managed by Judge Polster. Prior to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Calvin B. Champion v. Outlook Nashville, Inc., Debbie MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- In re Tylenol (Acetaminophen) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pamela Rheinfrank v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Raymond Burch, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.