Legal Opinion

School District No. 16-R v. McCormmach

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by defendants, William Orval MoCormmach and Merle McCormmach, husband and wife, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a directed verdict. The complaint alleged that during the school terms 1955-1956 to 1961-1962 defendants resided outside the plaintiff school district and that during these terms they sent their four children to schools within the plaintiff district. The plaintiff seeks a total of $8,511.42 non-resident tuition. The court awarded the plaintiff judgment for that amount.

The defendants and their children have, since 1955, made their home in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Zimmerman v. ZimmermanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Elwert v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Popejoy v. BoyntonOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. City of Tualatin v. City of DurhamOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. School District No. 3 of Maricopa County v. DaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API