Legal Opinion

Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 24, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

755 A.2d 1068 (2000)

2000 ME 143

Mary Jane HALLISSEY[1]

v.

SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT NO. 77.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted on Briefs February 8, 2000.

Decided July 24, 2000.

Francis J. Hallissey, Machias, for plaintiff.

Deirdre M. Smith, Hugh G.E. MacMahon, Drummond Woodsum & MacMahon, Portland, for defendant.

Panel: WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.

DANA, J.

[¶ 1] Mary Jane Hallissey appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Humphrey, J.) holding as a matter of law that Hallissey was not residing…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Handy Boat Service, Inc. v. Professional Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. City of Marlborough v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Tondreau v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. ValleeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API