Legal Opinion

Popejoy v. Boynton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1924PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

It is clearly proven, in our opinion, that the contract was made substantially as alleged in the complaint. The plaintiff in her testimony seemed somewhat confused as to whether the agreement was that the property should be deeded or willed to her, and seems to have used the terms interchangeably, and also stated that decedent had agreed to give it to her, but the whole tenor of her testimony indicates that while she was not clear in her distinction as to terms, and while the decedent was probably equally ignorant in these matters, the substance of the promise was that the title to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stevens v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Martin v. Wright's AdministratorsNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Oregon Construction Co. v. Allen Ditch Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wilkes v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hawkins v. DoeOregon Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Owens v. HuntlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Tigglebeck v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hunter v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Brooks v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  5. Schramm v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API