Legal Opinion

Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 24, 2000PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] Mary Jane Hallissey appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Humphrey, J.) holding as a matter of law that Hallissey was not residing within Maine School Administrative District No. 77 (SAD 77) for the purpose of receiving a tuition subsidy, pursuant to 20-A M.R.S.A. § 5204 (1983),2 to defray the cost of her son’s tuition at a private school. Hallissey contends that it was error for the court to determine as a matter of law (1) that she was not residing within SAD 77 during the years that she.lived in Cape Elizabeth so that she could attend law…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Handy Boat Service, Inc. v. Professional Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Tondreau v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. ValleeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Estate of WhittierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Churchill v. S. A. D. 49 Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carson v. MakinSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. S.D. Warren Co. v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. Ford Motor Company v. Darling'sSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Town of Eagle Lake v. Commissioner, Department of EducationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. Carson v. MakinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API