Legal Opinion

People v. Crespi

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1896No. Crim. No. 177PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The defendant, convicted of criminal libel in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, appeals from the judgment and from the order denying him a new trial.

The trial was had upon information filed in the superior court after examination held in the' police court of said city and county.

1. Appellant contends that his examination was without authority of law, and that therefore jurisdiction was never acquired by the superior court. This is based upon the provisions of the act of 1893, relative to the police court of San Francisco. (Stats. 1893, p. 9.)

Section 2 of that act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. JacobsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. MehaffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. NewsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API