Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Aburrea

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1919No. Civ. No. 2852PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, under the provisions of section 196a of the Civil Code, against the defendant, the putative father, for the support of her minor illegitimate child.

The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $115, for the support of the child from the date of the filing of the action until the entry of judgment, and for the further sum of $15 per month thereafter until the further order of the court. The defendant appeals.

The section of the Civil Code in question reads as follows : “The father as well as the mother of an illegitimate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Denham v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Rothschild v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Chase v. Jamestown Street Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. California Trout, Inc. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Perez v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Karlslyst v. FrazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API