Cheney v. City & County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of Thomas Walter Cheney, deceased, commenced an action to quiet title to a fund payable by the City and County of San Francisco out of the employees retirement system fund, pursuant to Ordinance No. 9134, effective January 8, 1932. The defendant, Florence Cheney, the mother of the decedent, filed a cross-complaint alleging that as the named beneficiary of the fund she was entitled to the whole thereof. The plaintiff alleged that the fund was the community property of the decedent and herself and pressed her right thereto as the surviving widow.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Estate of DargieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Abbott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Marriage of DawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Staley v. Estate of HarberArizona Supreme Court · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.