Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1911No. 459, 460PublishedCited by 1,877 opinions

APPEALS FROM'THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. This is a bill in equity to enjoin an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring appellants to cease and desist, on or before the first day of September, 1908 (subsequently postponed to November 15,' 1908), and for a period of not less than two years thereafter, from granting and giving undue preferences and advantages to one E. H. Young, a shipper of cotton seed products at…

Read the full summary

APPEALS FROM'THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. This is a bill in equity to enjoin an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring appellants to cease and desist, on or before the first day of September, 1908 (subsequently postponed to November 15,' 1908), and for a period of not less than two years thereafter, from granting and giving undue preferences and advantages to one E. H. Young, a shipper of cotton seed products at the port of Galveston, Texas, through failure to exact from him payment of wharfage charges for handling cotton seed cake…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

it will be observed that the order of the_ Commission required appellants to cease and desist-from granting Young the alleged undue preference for a period of not less than tyro1 .years from September 1, 1908 (subsequently extended to November 15)., It is hence contended that the order of the Commission has expired and that the case having thereby become moot, the appeal should be dismissed.

This court has said a number of times that it will only decide actual controversies, and if, pending an appeal, something occurs without any fault of the defendant which renders it impossible, if our…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Jones v. MontagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Richardson v. McChesneySupreme Court of the United States · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,877 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

1,872 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API