Legal Opinion

City of Lawton v. Akers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1958No. 37721PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary purpose of this action in the District Court of Comanche County, Oklahoma, by Paul Akers and others against the City of Lawton and its officers, as defendants, was to enjoin defendants from assessing the properties of plaintiffs with any part of the costs of Street Improvement District No. 91 by special assessment or street improvement bonds. From judgment permanently enjoining defendants from including plaintiffs' properties within the improvement district, defendants have appealed. The parties will be given their trial court designations. Defendants may also be referred to as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Gilfillan v. City of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Bragdon v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Crawford v. CassitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Rowley v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Ambrister v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Roberts v. City of BethanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. City of Muskogee v. BorumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API