Islais & Salinas Water Co. v. Allen
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES,C.
—This action is prosecuted by the plaintiff against a large number of defendants, including one R. C. De Boom, to quiet its title to a large tract of land, being part of the Rincon de las Salinas, or Bernal Rancho, situated in the city and county of San Francisco. .
De Boom alone answered, and after denying the material allegations of the complaint, alleged that he is the owner in fee, and in the possession and entitled to the possession, of a large number of lots and blocks, being a portion of the land described in the complaint, and after describing the portion so owned and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Germania Building & Loan Ass'n v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Kitts v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Larkin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Brooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- District Bond Co. v. PollackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.