Legal Opinion
Pacific Finance Corp. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13944PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After further consideration, we are satisfied that our former opinion, written by Mr. Justice Tyler, upon the question involved in this appeal makes a correct disposition of that question. We, therefore, adopt so much of said opinion as deals with and is decisive of said question. It is as follows:
“Mandamus to compel the dismissal of a cross-complaint.
“The record presents the following facts: Petitioner commenced an action in the Superior Court on January 21, 1927, against one Beck, defendant. An answer was filed March 3, 1927, and at the same time defendant filed a cross-complaint.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cragin v. . LovellNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Francis v. W. J. & J. G. Edwards & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Mott v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Islais & Salinas Water Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Skaff v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.