Kitts v. Austin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, and from an- order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
This was an action to quiet title; the defendant set up her adverse claim, and judgment passed in her favor, from which, and an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
From the findings, which are fully sustained by the evidence, it appears that the land in controversy is a portion of the public domain, and is comprised of ten acres within a larger tract, to which the defendant acquired the right of possession by a deed from Wilson and wife in 1867, wrho were at the time, and prior thereto had been, in the exclusive possession of the whole tract. Under this deed the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Whittaker v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Polack v. GurneeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Haven v. HawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Funk v. SterrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Islais & Salinas Water Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Dalrymple v. Security Loan & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Tally v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Martin v. BartmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Perego v. DodgeUtah Supreme Court · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.