Legal Opinion

McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1918No. Appeal, No. 336PublishedCited by 127 opinions

Appeal, No. 336, Jan. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1916, No. 4357, reversing decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board setting aside compensation award on claim petition No. 421, in case of Mary McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Company and London Guarantee and Accident Company. Appeal from Workmen’s Compensation Board. Before McMichael, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 336, Jan. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1916, No. 4357, reversing decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board setting aside compensation award on claim petition No. 421, in case of Mary McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Company and London Guarantee and Accident Company. Appeal from Workmen’s Compensation Board. Before McMichael, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The lower court reversed the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board and entered judgment upon the original award of the referee. Defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moschzisker,

The plaintiff, widow of James McCauley, claimed compensation for the death of her husband; the referee found in favor of the claimant;, the Workmen’s Compensation • Board reversed this finding; the case was removed to the Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which reversed the board and affirmed the referee; the defendant employer entered the present appeal.

Several interesting points of law are thus raised, which we shall pass upon separately. . The first of them may be divided into three branches, i. e., the jurisdiction on appeal of (a) the compensation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Independence Party NominationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. St. Clair Borough v. Tamaqua & Pottsville Elec. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. In re License to CarlsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Foy's ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API