Legal Opinion

Monahan v. Seeds & Durham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1939No. Appeal, 234PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff, the widow of Leo P. Monahan, for herself and her children, filed a claim for compensation against the defendant, as the employer of her deceased husband, alleging that he had died as the result of an accident occurring in the course of his employment. To this claim the employer filed an answer averring that Monahan’s death was not due to an accident, and in this answer the employer’s insurance carrier joined. After the first hearing the referee concluded that the death was not the result of an accident in the course of employment and dismissed the claim.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Stahl v. Watson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Powell v. RisserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Florig v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API