Legal Opinion

Barnabee v. Hunstock

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1919No. Civ. No. 3065PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a motion to vacate a judgment. Russ Avery, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The plaintiff in this action appealed from an order of the trial court denying her motion to vacate a judgment against her. The matter is presented at this time on respondent’s motion to affirm the order appealed from, on the ground that the record on appeal contains no bill of exceptions, nor reporter’s transcript certified by the judge who tried the cause and made the order, as is provided by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The record on appeal presented here consists of a clerk’s transcript containing the judgment-roll, together with certain papers and records purporting to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Totten v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Jaques v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Richmond v. Julian Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Knox v. SchragCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Smith v. QuestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Reed v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Gordon v. BeasoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. O'Banion v. California Canning Peach GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API