Richmond v. Julian Consolidated Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Paul J. McCormick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant on two promissory notes made by defendant to plaintiff's assignor. The defendant appeals from the judgment.
The record on appeal was prepared under the alternative method. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 953a, 953b, and 953c.) It is certified by the clerk alone.
The appellant’s first contention is that the action should have been dismissed, on its motion, for want of diligence in prosecution. The transcript contains copies of certain notices of motion, affidavits, and orders bearing on this matter. But it is settled by our decisions that, where a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Totten v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bush v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Lewis v. GrunbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Bell v. BriganceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Barnabee v. HunstockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Gordon v. BeasoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.