Totten v. Barlow
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. M. Conley, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment that he take nothing by his suit, and that defendant recover his costs taxed at the sum of five dollars. The appeal was taken in accord with the so-called new or alternative method for taking appeals provided by sections 941a, 941b, and 941c of the Code of Civil Procedure, a proper notice of appeal having been filed by plaintiff with the clerk within sixty days after notice of entry of the'judgment.
No bill of exceptions or statement of the case has been settled or presented, and no printed transcript of the judgment-roll has been filed.
Appellant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Christenson Lumber Co. v. SeawellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Knoch v. HaizlipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lane v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by19 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Johnson v. Hayes Cal Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Huffaker v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.