Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Beasore

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1927No. Docket No. 3301PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

The defendants Beasore and Jones have appealed from three orders of the superior court of Madera County and they are all presented upon the same record. One of said orders granted the plaintiffs an injunction pendente lite and the other two are orders refusing to vacate and set aside the above order for injunction.

The plaintiffs have made a motion in this court to dismiss all of the appeals because the record is not certified by the judge as required by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appeals having been taken under the so-called alternative method. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Martin v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bell v. BriganceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Richmond v. Julian Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Barnabee v. HunstockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Security First National Bank v. J. G. Ruddle Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API