Reed v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying defendants’ motion to vacate their default. Charles S. Burnell, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
The defendants have appealed from an order made by the superior court on the sixteenth day of May, 1921, which was an order made after entry of judgment in the action. By said order the court denied a motion of the defendants to vacate the default entered against them, and to set aside an order striking out their fourth amended answer, and that they be permitted to file a fifth amended answer.
[1] Respondents now move that the order appealed from be affirmed for the reason that appellants have not filed any transcript containing any judgment-roll or bill of exceptions upon which said appeal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Barnabee v. HunstockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. QuestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Security First National Bank v. J. G. Ruddle Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934