Legal Opinion

Paul A. Mosesian & Sons, Inc. v. Danielian

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1942No. Civ. 3016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In this action respondent seeks to recover from appellant ordinary as well as treble damages under section 3346 of the Civil Code. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is and was the owner of the real property involved, i. e., N. % of the S. E. % of the S. W. 14 °f sec. 30, T. 15 S. R. 23 E., M. D. B. & M.; that defendant on June 4,1939, entered upon the land and without leave did cut down and tear out forty-nine peach trees growing thereon belonging to plaintiff of the value of $980; that plaintiff lost said trees and thereby the defendants by force and effect of section 3346 of the Civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sly v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Wagoner v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hatton v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Swall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Crofoot Lumber, Inc. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Roche v. CasissaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Caldwell v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API