Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1963No. Civ. 20387PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

In this action for damages for the cutting, logging and removal of timber, the sole question for our determination is whether the evidence is sufficient to justify an award of treble damages in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs J. C. Caldwell, hereafter referred to as Caldwell, and Rachel V. Caldwell are husband and wife. The defendants Kenneth W. Walker, hereinafter referred to as Walker, and Virginia A. Walker are also husband and wife.

Caldwell was a rancher and was also engaged in the timber business. For a number of years he owned a 1,300-acre ranch in Humboldt County known as the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sturges v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Swall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Crofoot Lumber, Inc. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Drewry v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Kelly v. Choon YeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Holland v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Scholes v. Lambirth Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Pehrson v. SaderupUtah Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API