Roche v. Casissa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
This is an action for treble damages for wrongful cutting of trees upon plaintiffs’ land. Defendants Casissa employed defendant Erb to top trees. Among those cut were 14 redwood trees and one bay tree located on plaintiffs’ property. Erb answered separately and cross-complained against his codefendants for costs and attorney’s fees. After trial without jury, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants Casissa for $2,400 “which said sum is three times the actual damage done.” Cross-complainant Erb had judgment against defendants Casissa for his costs. The treble damages…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Swall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bate v. JolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Baker v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Stewart v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Fick v. NilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Young v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Drewry v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.