Hatton v. Gregg
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County. B. V. Sargent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment enjoining defendant from destroying plaintiffs’ fences on certain described lands of plaintiffs, and also from cutting down, digging up, removing or destroying any willow trees, brush or undergrowth standing or growing on plaintiffs’ said lands.
The lands of plaintiffs involved in this action include the same land in controversy in the action between the same parties and numbered 313, and the appeal in which we have this day determined. The two actions were tried together, and the same point as to the effect of a view of the premises by the judge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Clavey v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hill v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Paul A. Mosesian & Sons, Inc. v. DanielianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Cambridge v. RamserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919