Legal Opinion
H.I.M./Fathom, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 14, 1997No. Court No. 92-12-00808PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff, H.I.M./Fathom (“Fathom”), challenges the United States Customs Service’s (“Customs”) classification of its import merchandise, including wetsuits, wetsuit shoes, wetsuit headgear, wetsuit gloves and weight belts as “garments”1 under headings 6113 and 6114, 6404.19.80,6505.90.60,6116.10.25 and 6217.10.00, respectively, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1990). Plaintiff contends its imports are properly classified as “other water-sport equipment” under HTSUS Chapter 95. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Winter-Wolff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Rubie's Costume Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- 3G Mermet Fabric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.