Legal Opinion
Winter-Wolff, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 20, 1998No. Slip Op.98-15. Court No. 95-12-01712PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Judge.
Plaintiff importer, Winter-Wolff, Inc., (“Winter-Wolff”) challenges the United States Customs Service’s (“Customs”) classification of laser-treated aluminum capacitor foil imported from Switzerland in 1995.
In response to plaintiff’s request for a ruling, the District Director at the port of Ogdensburg, New York, classified the laser-treated foil as aluminum foil, not further worked, under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheading 7607.11.30, dutiable at a rate of 5.8% ad valorem. Plaintiff filed a timely protest of the ruling with Customs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Novosteel SA v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Cummins Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.