Legal Opinion
3G Mermet Fabric Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 13, 2001No. SLIP OP. 01-28; 98-04-00669PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
This case is before the court after trial de novo. At issue is the proper tariff classification under 19 U.S.C. § 1202 (1988), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), of 3G Mermet’s (“Plaintiff’) imported window shade fabrics. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a)(1994).
Background
In 1997, Plaintiff imported several varieties of window shade fabrics: Satiné 5500, Natté 4500, E Screen 4100, Flocké 11201, 1 Paradis 11600, and Auris 11190. The United States Customs Service (“Customs”), upon liquidation, classified the window shade…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Lonza, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Mead Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alcan Food Packaging (Shelbyville) v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Structural Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- 3G Mermet Fabric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- 3g Mermet Fabric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- International Home Textiles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001