Legal Opinion
Cohn v. Klein
California Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 9845PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON, J.—
The sole question for consideration upon this appeal is the validity on its face of an instrument in writing in words and figures following, to wit:
“This agreement, made this 2nd day of August, 1923, by and between Charles Cohn, of Bakersfield, Kern County, California, party of the first part, and E. A. Klein, of the same place, party of the second part, witnesseth: Whereas, the party of the first part has become cognizant of the many charities and good works of Ethel Klein, wife of the party of the second part, and also work done by the party of the second part for many, persons…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Patchett v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Cass v. RochesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Montgomery v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.