Legal Opinion

Palpar, Inc. v. Thayer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1947No. Civ. 13425PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This appeal is taken on the judgment roll. The plaintiff and appellant, Palpar, Incorporated, filed its complaint as vendee and assignee of Morton. The complaint alleged the purchase by Morton and respondent Thayer in 1941, under a contract of conditional sale of a certain tractor and equipment; the full payment of the purchase price; the coownership of Morton and Thayer; an arrangement between Morton and Thayer for Thayer’s use of the tractor with an agreement to pay Morton one-half of the profits received by Thayer from its use and operation; and the transfer by Morton of all his rights to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ortega v. CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Oliver v. the Swiss Club TellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API