Legal Opinion
Vance v. Fordham
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1983No. 18176PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
Appellant, an osteopathic physician, had his license revoked by respondent, Director of the Department of Registration. The revocation was for “unprofessional conduct” pursuant to a recommendation of the Department’s Osteopathic Committee after the notice and hearing specified in U.C.A., 1953, §§ 58-1-25 to -33. The district court sustained the administrative action.
On this appeal from the district court, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for the administrative finding and the legality of a revocation for “unprofessional conduct” when the Department has not…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Gilbertville Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Hurley v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Heinecke v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational & Professional LicensingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- T.B. v. M.M.J.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.